Author Archives: GK Strategy

Challenges for the integrated health care agenda this winter

Challenges for the integrated health care agenda this winter

The Omicron variant, parliamentary scrutiny and a distracted Government are all hindering the development of Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) and there are concerns about the framework that sits around them.

Amidst the capacity and workforce pressures faced by the health service this winter, longer-term ambitions for the transformation of our health and care system are also feeling the strain.

The timelines for formalisation and statutory responsibility of the 42 Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) in England have been pushed back. The intention is now for them to be given their full statutory responsibilities by 1st  July this year rather than 1st April as originally planned. The primary reason given for this delay is to allow parliament an acceptable amount of time to review and approve the proposed changes.

Even with this extension, there is growing frustration that this wholescale reconfiguration of the health system is not being accompanied by the required due diligence and planning.

The Health and Care Bill – the legislation that will enable these reforms – has reached the House of Lords and the early signs are the Government are in for a bumpy ride.

It’s times like this where the second chamber can demonstrate both its value and its limitations. More sector specialists, less constrained by time pressures and careerism often makes for a better assessment of the changes proposed. Any substantive improvements to the legislation are likely to come from the Lords, the challenge or opportunity depending on your perspective is that any amendments must be approved by the Commons, where the Government has a strong majority and can whip MPs effectively. Therefore, sensible Lords amendments may well be reversed prior to the Bill receiving Royal Assent.

The concern for the Government is that the Lords are starting to highlight that the legislation is poorly planned and drafted. In the Autumn of 2021, Health Secretary Sajid Javid admitted that “significant areas of contention” had yet to be resolved with the reconfiguration of the health system the Bill and he’s being proved right.

The initial assessment from the Lords has been both scathing and embarrassing for the Government. the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee has stated that  the Bill “falls so short of the standards which the Committee — and Parliament — are entitled to expect” and the legislation is a perfect example of a wider issue of “how much disguised legislation a Bill can contain and offends against the democratic principles of parliamentary scrutiny”.

Furthermore, just as the Bill was due to begin its Committee Stage the Lords Shadow Health Spokesperson, Baroness Thornton, also identified that proceedings couldn’t legally begin without an impact assessment related to parts of the legislation. The Government has apologised for the oversight and the very short notice that they were shared.

Taken together, these issues all add to the impression that the reforms are being rushed through, at a time of extreme pressure on the health system with not enough evaluation of the impact and practical implementation of new powers and accountabilities. The biggest concern among those who favour greater health devolution is that the Bill will reinforce the instinctive tendencies of the government and NHSE towards greater centralisation and prescription, and continued NHS dominance of the health and care agenda.

During January and early February 2022, the Lords will undertake a line-by-line examination and vote on each clause of the legislation – including the long list of amendments tabled by Peers.

Trying to predict which amendments will garner enough support is difficult – let alone which the Government may concede on – but topics that have high profile backers and cross-party support include:

  • The extent of Ministerial control – Limiting the so-called ‘power grab’ by the Health Secretary as part of this bill – the extension of powers will enable the Minister to intervene directly on local and regional health matters. This is being opposed by Opposition parties and prominent NHS representative bodies such as NHS Confederation.
  • Workforce planning and updates – there is strong cross party and cross chamber backing for Regular, independent and public workforce projection data. Former Health Secretary, and Chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee Jeremy Hunt tabled an amendment in the Commons and the Lords will now try to force the issue again.
  • Mental health funding – former NHS England Chief Executive – now crossbench peer – Sir Simon Stevens has proposed amendments that require government, NHSE and ICSs to publish mental health spending detail including whether spending was increasing as a share of overall funding.
  • Parity of esteem for mental health is still a work in progress and despite this being an emotive issue with an increasing demand for services, it is unlikely that the Government will tie itself to this type of funding scrutiny given the financial pressures faced across the board.

Of course, it’s not just the Parliamentarians that are frustrated, many ICS leaders – preparing to go live with their accountable duties – only found out about the delay via third party sources with the Department of Health & Social Care and NHS England’s communications leaving much to be desired. Louise Patten, Chief Executive of NHS Clinical Commissioners recently outlined that that the delay causes confusion about local leadership responsibilities and partnership working with local government and threatens accountability.

Moreover, the delay in publication of the Integration White Paper, further guidance on developing place-based Integrated Care Partnerships and the Levelling Up White Paper also means that many areas are continuing to develop new local partnership governance arrangements in the absence of a national policy framework.

And of course, all of this hugely matters to patients, the healthcare workforce and organisations trying to supply the health system with the services and technology it needs.

Organisations with a stake in health care delivery need to ensure that they monitor the passage of this legislation and importantly seek the practical understanding of where accountability and commissioning responsibility lies within ICS ‘footprint’ regions.

For further information about the implementation and impact of ICS’, please email joecormack@gkstrategy.com

GK Insight: 5-Year Predictions

At the start of 2022, we asked our GK Team to give us an insight into how they think the next 5-years will pan out.

Milo:
Wes Streeting leader of the Labour Party in a formal coalition government with the Liberal Democrats after a general election in Spring 2024, with a re-strengthened ‘red wall’ and the informal support of the Scottish Nationalists on the condition of an independence referendum – which will be lost by the Nationalists. Northern Ireland to remain part of the United Kingdom despite Sinn Fein winning Irish elections in 2025.

Joe:
In 2027 we’ll have a minority Labour Government or Progressive Coalition elected on a mandate to fix public services, improve creaking infrastructure, and restore financial security for millions of people.

In healthcare, new Integrated Care Systems and Partnerships will have improved link between different parts of the NHS and a greater emphasis will be placed on holistic care. Workforce recruitment and retention will finally have turned the corner, but a solution for a more equitably funded social care system will still be missing.

Iain:
I think we’ll be in another period of coalition government in five years’ time as, on current form, there will be no outright winner of the next general election. If so, it’s likely to be a period (as with the previous coalition) in which potential constitutional changes loom large.

In terms of policy issues, I think there will be real frustration (which could, alas, lead to some political polarisation) that:

  • we didn’t do more to prevent global warming as, in five years’ time, I think its seriousness and effects will finally be evident to everyone
  • the UK’s national debt had been allowed to soar, over the previous 20 years, to levels which will make it much harder to fund key public services – due to debt servicing costs.

Positively, the widespread introduction of driverless cars will be looming, which could transform the quality of life of millions of Britons – especially the elderly.

Finally, there will be a national (well, English) feelgood factor as Jurgen Klopp becomes the England football manager – leading to the team actually winning something, at last, and assured ‘national treasure’ status for the man himself!

Will:
Boris Johnson will lead the Conservatives into the General Election to be held in May 2024, resulting in a hung Parliament and Labour narrowly the largest party in the House of Commons. Johnson largely recovers his own personal position during the remainder of this Parliament, but recent sex scandals among his MPs prove to be the tip of the iceberg, with further and more serious revelations destroying any hopes for the Conservatives remaining in Government. Johnson will be the last Conservative Prime Minister for a generation, as the minority Labour Government introduces electoral reform as the price for Liberal Democrat support, ultimately leading to a splintering on the right of British politics.

The union of the United Kingdom will continue to come under significant pressure during the course of the next five years, but Northern Ireland – not Scotland – will be the first to break away from the UK. Despite this, Brexit more generally will come to be viewed as an economic success, with at least one other EU member state holding a referendum on EU membership within the next 5 years.

Sam:
By 2027, I expect the Labour Party to have built substantial political momentum and to have eroded the Conservatives’ majority in Westminster, formulating a progressive coalition on a mandate of investment in green infrastructure and renewables, modernising and investing in the NHS, and developing an education system that puts the needs of children at the centre. As part of this, I expect the devolution agenda to have been given more substance, which will see lessons learned from Welsh Labour, and more powerful combined authorities across the UK begin to emerge, allowing powers for education, health and care, and planning decisions to be taken into the hands of local people in pursuit of levelling up the UK.

Louise:
Post a general election with no landslide victories – new leadership across both parties. And a women heading up the Labour Party
At least 5 departmental rebrands ….
GK will be staffed by some of the great interns from I Have a Voice making our business more diverse
PE investing in emerging regulatory deals – and GK advising on the political, policy and regulatory aspects of fintech, greentech and more.
Reconsideration of our role in Europe – still out but with closer working

Lavinia:
In five years, there will be the bittersweet realisation that leaving the EU brought more regulatory headaches than benefits. While returning to the EU will be still a question mark, the five-year from now government hopefully will understand the importance of maintaining close relationship with countries near the UK

Dani:
In 2027, the majority Labour Government attempts to further foster the UK’s relationship with the EU to counter the variegated complexities in international relations caused by Russia’s and China’s expansionalism and military threats. In addition with the reality of climate change and a persistent global food crisis, the UK Government and it’s people, who are enjoying a period of economic boom following a recession which decimated the Conservative party, vow to tackle both. Working with western nations who so far have prioritised domestic inward investment, innovative and renewable businesses will be given the platform to invent, change and benefit society as a whole.

Scott:
After the next General Election, the Conservative Party will be the largest party but fall short of an overall majority. They will form a government with the support of the DUP, who in Northern Ireland will face the prospect of a united Ireland, largely caused by years of frustration over the EU border and changing attitudes towards links to Great Britain.

The Conservative Party will, however, be led into the next General Election by a different leader, Johnson’s resignation will allow for the fourth renewal of the party in 15 years. The Labour Party will make gains but fail again to reconnect with its former heartlands in Scotland and the North of England. Labour, Liberal Democrats and Green Party will all face a period of introspection as they rethink their proposition to the country.

English nationalism will continue to threaten all the main parties. Scotland has voted for independence, via a referendum granted by Holyrood not Westminster, leading to protracted legal challenge in the Supreme Court frustrating the will of the Scottish people.

Robin:
Another coalition government, this time led by a woman.
Scotland devolved even more powers and autonomy to ward off independence.
Gk to be operating across the globe.
Pension age raised to 72.
England win the world Cup with Sir Alex Ferguson coming out of retirement and managing England to victory.

Sam:
By 2027, I expect the Labour Party to have eroded the Conservatives’ majority in Westminster, formulating a progressive coalition on a mandate of investment in green infrastructure and renewables, modernising and investing in the NHS, and developing an education system that puts the needs of children at the centre. As part of this, I expect the devolution agenda to be given more substance, which will see lessons learned from Welsh Labour, and more powerful combined authorities across the UK begin to emerge, allowing powers for education, health and care, and planning decisions to be taken into the hands of local people in pursuit of levelling up the UK.

Natasha:
In the short term, price rises will eventually subside and supply chains will be strengthened as a result of shocks dealt during the pandemic and war in Europe. Ongoing energy instability and factional infighting will produce more and more hung parliaments, the result of which will surely be a progressive coalition scrapping first past the post and instituting proportional representation. Expect more conversations about alternative constitutional arrangements as the clamour for more independence referendums and debates about English devolution and ‘devo max’ come back to the top of the agenda. In 5 years time it is likely all urban areas will have directly elected mayors, complete with increased powers to raise and spend money locally.

Speaking of referendums, I expect one on net zero, which will be won by a coalition of progressives, giving them a mandate to institute radical (and necessary) climate policy, starting with the mass insulation of all homes. Finally, the House of Lords turns into a federal, elected upper house, able to wield a veto on bills that impact the constitutional settlement, but with no remit to vote on bills that relate to money or public finances.

Nicole:
With China, India and Russia increasing their spheres of influence (although Russia will continue to decline) as well as the economies of the former two world powers rapidly growing, the remaining Western liberal democracies will continue to ramp up cooperation on security, economy and other policies. This will result in the accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO, Ukraine to the EU and increased reliance of 5 Eyes.

Moreover, with these growing giants, we will see a world turning to populism and nationalism, which will affect the usual suspects but also turn the US back to the GOP, Canada trusting the Conservatives again following the progressive reign of Trudeau, and the UK carrying on with the Tories despite the Boris administration’s scandals, albeit under a different leader.

Josh:
The Conservative Party will be badly wounded by a failure to implement the proposals in the ‘Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill’ to the satisfaction of voters, leading to a hung Parliament after the 2024 General Election. However, the Labour Party will only have limited success in putting the ‘Red Wall’ back together as recent Conservative efforts to woo South Asian voters bear fruit. Both parties will struggle to reconcile shifting voter bases as the effects of voter realignment become more noticeable.

This will lead to further splits on ‘the Left’ as the Labour Party struggles to create coherent social policy that is palatable to both younger, middle-class voters and older, working-class voters, who had previously considered themselves Labour’s core demographic. As a result of Boris Johnson’s lack of ideological focus, the Conservative Party ‘overcorrects’ after his resignation, lurching rightwards in order to energise grassroots activists and quash any attempts by other parties on ‘the Right’ to steal voters away. The increasing use of ‘culture wars’ by the Conservatives, arising from this overcorrection, will resonate with some disillusioned former Labour voters and partially blunt messaging from the Labour Party, but it is also likely to push traditional Tory voters from the ‘shires’ towards the Liberal Democrats.

On the policy front, the FCA will advocate more vigorously for the increased use of RegTech by firms to adjust to the proliferation of new technologies and the pressing need to create a more structured regulatory environment. The Government will also promote more public/private schemes to encourage the building of RegTech ecosystems to ensure greater compliance and potentially facilitate cross-border investments that could boost UK-based start-ups.

Deeds not Words- Are People Really at the ‘Heart of Care’_

Deeds not Words: Are People Really at the ‘Heart of Care’?

Following the publication of the highly anticipated Adult Social Care White Paper, Phil Hope, former Care Minister, assesses the plans announced and identifies what more needs to be done to improve the sector.

Read Phil’s thoughts in Deeds not Words.

For more information, please contact GK’s Head of Health, Joe Cormack on joecormack@gkstrategy.com

GK- Perspective on German Political Landscape

GK: Perspective on German Political Landscape

On 24th November 2021, the new German coalition finally revealed the new Government coalition deal, including the announcement that Olaf Scholz, leader of the Social Democrats (SPD) will become the next German Chancellor. The coalition has revealed a nearly 170-pages long programme, which describes the objectives for both Germany and the EU.

Looking at the coalition agreement, formed by the SDP, the Greens and the conservative-liberal Free Democrats (FDP), some might say that their objectives are decidedly pro-European. First and foremost, the new German Government is hoping that the current Conference on the Future of Europe will lead to developments for a federal European state., moving towards a Community method that would give more weight to the European institutions. The coalition deal contains proposals to improve the democracy levels within the EU by introducing a common European electoral law, including transnational lists of candidates. The push is also for the EU to better implement its rule of law, especially to countries such as Poland and Hungary.

On foreign policy, the coalition is planning to push for a stronger European External Action Service. This includes the nomination of a real ‘EU foreign minister’, which would eliminate the requirement of unanimity for all foreign policy decision-making. Suggestions include the movement to qualified majority voting on foreign policy, but with a mechanism that would allow smaller countries to participate appropriately. The programme also announces for increased cooperation among the national armies of member states that are willing to integrate. These propositions have been made to ease basic matters within foreign policy decision-making and potentially increase the military capabilities of the EU bloc.

The new German coalition seems open to a reform of EU fiscal policies, and a subsequent form of fiscal solidarity, which might be perceived as positive by certain southern countries, such as Italy or Spain. Other plans include the possibility to back a ‘European reinsurance for national deposit guarantee schemes’, which is a mention to furthering the Banking Union. However, the parties have differences on the Economic and Monetary Union, and a strict reading of the Growth Pact would limit the possibilities to effectively restructure the Eurozone. Furthermore, the parties do not share the same vision for the constitutional limit on government borrowing, which has been provisionally eliminated in the EU due to COVID-19. This implies that FDP sees the Next Generation EU recovery package as to be provisional, while the other parties believe in a package that can be extended in the future. Another issue for the coalition and for the EU is the lack of money within German finances for green investments, which could cause conflict with the Greens.

With respect to Brexit and the nearly one-year old UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA), the German coalition does not seem to move from previous stances taken by Germany. They will push for a common European policy towards the UK, and it insists on the need for a full compliance of the agreements signed by both sides, with a particular focus on the Northern Ireland Protocol. The coalition also highlights that any non-compliance from the UK must lead to the application of all agreed measures and countermeasures.

This coalition will have to overcome great challenges. The most important one will be to have strong enough legitimacy to ensure that Germany is continued to be viewed as on of the EU leaders. Germany has created its leadership within the EU following certain values, including federalism and the rule of law as an anchor for the state apparatus. The confirmation or rejection of these values will have enormous impacts on Germany’s relationship with the EU. The second challenge is seen by some by the introduction of the new chancellor figure of Scholz. Angela Merkel was seen as a form of consistency and a great diplomat in the formation and maintenance of relationships, for example between Germany and France or between the EU and more rebellious member states such as Poland and Hungary. The question is whether now the coalition will be good enough to form a united front and for Scholz to maintain such relationships on good levels. This is particularly the case with policy objectives and the current definition of Ministries and Ministers. For example, for foreign policy it looks like the Greens are claiming the seat, while defence will go to the FDP. This might bring to some clashes where the aspects of foreign and defence policy overlap. It will be Scholz’s role to ensure unity within the parties. Conflict might cause the Government to result disunited, which will have an impact both internally and externally, too, especially with the fourth wave of the pandemic arriving on German shores. Lastly, challenges can also be translated to Brexit and the relationship that the EU has with the United Kingdom. Germany calls for the strict application of the agreed treaties to make the most of the political opportunities that lie ahead. The three parties will have to go beyond decisions based on the ‘lowest common denominator’ and instead pursue a strong front to the challenges that both Germany and the EU have ahead.

 

If you would like to discuss the German political landscape, or require investment advisory on an international deal please contact lavinia@gkstrategy.com